<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eco review: Beyond organic skincare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecostreet.com/blog/eco-review/2008/02/26/eco-review-beyond-organic-skincare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/eco-review/2008/02/26/eco-review-beyond-organic-skincare/</link>
	<description>Raising Green Consciousness since 2002</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bonny Bélanger</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/eco-review/2008/02/26/eco-review-beyond-organic-skincare/#comment-68022</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonny Bélanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/eco-review/2008/02/26/eco-review-beyond-organic-skincare/#comment-68022</guid>
		<description>Although glass is traditionally preferred over plastic for skin care products, glass is actually FAR more taxing on the environment. (This fact was a shocker to me!)

For the health of people as well as the environment, the preferable bottling would be a non-leaching plastic container.

Kind Regards,
Bonny Bélanger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although glass is traditionally preferred over plastic for skin care products, glass is actually FAR more taxing on the environment. (This fact was a shocker to me!)</p>
<p>For the health of people as well as the environment, the preferable bottling would be a non-leaching plastic container.</p>
<p>Kind Regards,<br />
Bonny Bélanger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
